Showing posts with label Kansas City Lawyer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kansas City Lawyer. Show all posts

Monday, February 11, 2013

What Happens to Property at Divorce?

The disposition of property can often be a contentious issue for parties seeking a legal separation or the dissolution of a marriage. As part of the dissolution process, each party will submit documents to the court that illustrate their respective incomes and expenses, as well as a statement of non-martial and marital assets and debts. During the proceeding, the court will then, pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.330, set aside each spouse’s own separate property and further divide the marital property and marital debts as it deems proper.

In general, any property owned by a spouse prior to the marriage remains that spouse’s sole and separate property. It is non-marital property. Marital property, on the other hand, is considered to be all of the property acquired by either spouse during the course of the marriage. But there are several exceptions. If a spouse receives property as a gift, or by means of inheritance, that property is not martial. Any property that is acquired in exchange for any property a spouse owned prior to the marriage is also not considered to be martial property. Property obtained after a decree of legal separation is excluded as well. Parties can further agree to exclude property by way of a valid written agreement.

Aside from the exceptions noted above, any property acquired during the marriage will be presumed to be martial property. Title alone is not enough to sway the presumption. Even if property is titled individually in one spouse’s name, it will be presumed to be martial. It is possible to overcome the presumption by showing that the property falls under one of the exceptions. In a similar vein, separate property that has been mixed, or commingled, with martial property does not necessarily become marital property.

When the court divides the marital property between parties in a dissolution or legal separation, it will take a number of relevant factors into consideration. The value of the non-marital property set aside to each spouse and the custodial arrangements made for any minor children are among such factors. The court will also weigh the desirability of awarding the family home to the party with custody of the children. In addition, the court will consider the economic circumstances of each spouse, the conduct of the parties during the marriage, and the contribution of each party in acquiring the marital property. The role of a spouse as a homemaker shall be taken into consideration when determining that spouse’s contribution.

Contributions by Kelly Thompson, Law Clerk

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

What happens if I don’t reaffirm my mortgage in a chapter 7 bankruptcy?

A reaffirmation agreement is a document that is executed after your bankruptcy case is filed. It renews your obligation to a secured creditor, who has the right to repossess a vehicle or foreclose on your property if you fall behind on payments post-filing. It also makes you responsible for any deficiency balance after the sale of the property. It basically strips that debt of the bankruptcy protection. However, there are many benefits to reaffirming a debt too, including an easier time refinancing and positive reporting on your credit report.

If you intend to keep a house, vehicle, or piece of property secured by a lien, the creditor may prepare a reaffirmation agreement and forward it to your attorney. It is the Creditor who is responsible for preparing these agreements and they cannot be forced to do to. If you choose to sign a reaffirmation agreement generally your attorney’s office completes the required information, forwards it to you for review and signature, then it gets sent back to the creditor for filing with the bankruptcy court. If your budget (Schedules I and J) shows you can afford the payment and that it is not a hardship, no hearing is necessary (in WDMO and District of Kansas). The creditor files the agreement with the court and you are responsible for that debt regardless of your bankruptcy filing.

Not reaffirming a debt, especially a mortgage can sound like a good idea to you initially. It seems as though you can just pay each month and remain in the property. It is true that state contract law protects you to the extent that if you keep up with payments, the property cannot be taken away. And if something does happen financially in the future, such as illness or loss of income, you can surrender the house or car without having to worry about the deficiency balance. Because if no reaffirmation agreement was filed, it means the debt was discharged. And for the most part, that can be true. But, you need to be sure to speak to your attorney about the best option for you because there can be some consequences to not reaffirming a property in your chapter 7 bankruptcy.

One big problem with not reaffirming is credit reporting. If you don’t reaffirm the mortgage, the creditor will likely stop reporting payments to the credit bureaus even though you are making the payments on time each month. The mortgage debt may appear as being discharged in bankruptcy. So, your credit score may take a hit. This can make getting a new loan difficult. Another major problem can be with refinancing or modification. Many lenders will not refinance or modify a loan if a reaffirmation agreement was never filed. So, you will likely be locked into the original loan terms that you have until you decide to sell the property or let it foreclose. It can leave you with few, if any options if you find that the payments are no longer affordable. At that point your only option may be to surrender the property and walk away. And on that note, there are a few things to keep in mind if you are facing foreclosure. Until the property is transferred out of your name (after the foreclosure sale), you need to keep insurance on the property, keep up with maintenance, winterize and secure the property if vacant, and ensure compliance with city rules and codes. As long as it’s in your name, you are responsible for anything that happens to the property, and those fines and costs imposed by a city code violation, fire, etc. are not dischargeable if they happened after your bankruptcy was filed.

So, overall the best option is to speak to your bankruptcy attorney about your options with reaffirming a debt, especially a mortgage debt. They will be able to give you the best advice for your particular situation.

Contributions by Kelley Snyder, Paralegal

Sources:

http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/refinancing-without-reaffirming-in-bankruptcy/

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/bankruptcy/20061121_debts_reaffirmed_a1.asp

http://www.loansafe.org/what-happens-if-you-do-not-reaffirm-your-mortgage-in-bankruptcy

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Child Orders of Protection: A Brief Overview

Orders of protection are available to children as well as adults. In Missouri, child orders of protection are governed by the Missouri Revised Statutes §§ 455.500 - 455.538. These statutory sections are known as the Child Protection Orders Act.

When is a child order of protection available?
An order of protection may be sought on behalf of a child in situations where the child has been a victim of domestic violence by a former or current household member or any person stalking the child. Domestic violence itself is broadly defined by statute as abuse or stalking. Abuse generally encompasses, but is not limited to, assault, battery, coercion, harassment, sexual assault, and unlawful imprisonment. Child discipline, such as spanking, does not constitute abuse as long as it is performed in a reasonable manner. Stalking occurs when a person intentionally engages in a pattern of conduct that serves no legitimate purpose, causes fear of physical harm, and is repeated over time.

Who can file?
A verified petition for a child order of protection may be filed by a parent or guardian of the child, the juvenile officer, or guardian ad litem or court-appointed special advocate that has been appointed for the child.

The petition may be filed in the county where the child resides, where the respondent may be served, or where the alleged abuse took place. Orders of protection are designed for immediate access and are generally pro se friendly. Court clerks are available to explain the filing procedures and provide the necessary forms to petitioners who are not represented by counsel. There are no filing fees for child orders of protection.

What happens next?
Once a verified petition has been filed, a guardian ad litem or court-appointed special advocate will be appointed for the child. A hearing will be set for no later than fifteen days after the filing of the petition. To provide relief for the time that elapses prior to the hearing, the court may issue an ex parte order.

Ex Parte Orders
Ex parte orders essentially provide temporary relief. Upon the filing of a verified petition, an ex parte will only be issued upon a finding that there are no prior or pending orders of custody, and that the respondent is not younger than seventeen years old. If the petition shows good cause, the court can immediately issue an ex parte order of protection. Good cause may be shown by an immediate and present danger of abuse to the child. A respondent does not need to receive notice or have an opportunity to be heard for an ex parte order to be issued.

Intended to protect the child victim, ex parte orders can include terms that the court deems necessary to ensure the child’s safety. An order can restrain the respondent from disturbing the peace of the child, communicating with the child, and abusing or threatening the child. An order can also exclude the respondent the family home or household if the court finds that it is in the best interest of the children remaining in the home, that there is a substantial risk of domestic violence unless the respondent is excluded, and that a remaining adult household member is able to care for the children in the respondent’s absence. An ex parte order can also include a temporary custody order.

An ex parte order remains in effect until the time of the hearing. At the hearing, the court may grant a full order or protection.

Full Orders of Protection
Unlike ex parte orders, full orders of protection are issued after the respondent has received notice of the hearing and had an opportunity to be heard. Personal service upon the respondent is required at least three days before the hearing for the issuance of a full order of protection.

At the hearing, a full order may be granted by the court if the petitioner proves the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. Full orders of protection can temporarily enjoin the respondent from engaging in same actions and manners as ex parte orders. Upon issuing a full order of protection, the court can also award custody, visitation, child support, and maintenance, all subject to certain conditions. In addition, the court can order the respondent to participate in counseling, pay the cost of any treatment, make rent or mortgage payments, or pay fees for housing and other services that are provided to the child by a shelter for domestic violence victims.

Full orders of protection remain in effect for at least 180 days, but not for longer than one year. The order may be renewed upon another hearing. A finding of a subsequent or new act of abuse toward the child is not necessary for the renewal of a protection order.

For more information on this matter, contact the Kansas City Attorneys of Heartland Law.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Paternity Suits

A paternity suit is a lawsuit, usually by the mother of a child, to establish the legal relationship between a child and his/her biological father under Missouri’s version of the Uniform Parentage Act.

There are three parts to a paternity action:
  1. A judicial declaration of paternity and ordering father’s name to be added to the birth certificate, 
  2. A child support order, 
  3. A plan for custody and visitation referred to as a parenting plan. 

Evidence of paternity can be from various sources including
  1. A DNA test, 
  2. A signed Affidavit of Paternity at the hospital at the time of the birth, 
  3. aEvidence that the child was presented as ones’ child, including bringing the child home to raise. 

The parenting plan for the child addresses whether custody will be sole custody or joint custody and provides a schedule for visits. The Missouri legislature has expressed a preference for joint custody and takes the position that a continuing relationship with both parents is the ideal for a child’s healthy development. The parenting plan will provide for decision making as to the child’s education, medical care and religious upbringing. Child support is determined based on a calculation that takes the parents’ income and expenses into account. One of the parent’s addresses is designate the child’s permanent address for residential and educational purposes.

The parenting plan becomes a permanent part of the final judgment, providing the legal structure of the family of the child in the absence of a marriage, as well as protection in the event of interference with custody.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Do You Need A Lawyer To File For Bankruptcy?

In this day and age, the internet has become a viable source for everything from buying groceries to purchasing a plane ticket. However, using the internet to research information about bankruptcy can be a slippery slope, filled with bad information or things that do not apply to each unique situation. It is possible to file a bankruptcy case yourself, however it is not recommended. When dealing with this type of case, you have to file correctly, have all required documents properly filled out, and list all property and debts, or your case could be dismissed. Another thing to keep in mind is individual cases are randomly audited. “The audit checks for accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness.” You must not lie, falsify records, or destroy or hide property (1).Filing for bankruptcy in Missouri, Kansas, or any other state is an extremely technical and complex process. A single error could negatively affect the results of your case or even result in your case being dismissed. In certain situations those errors can lead to the debtor losing the right to file another bankruptcy and/or lose certain protections in future cases.

The term “pro se” mean to advocate on one’s own behalf before a court, rather than being represented by an attorney. A pro se litigant is still expected to recognize the rules and procedures of the local and federal courts. One must also be familiar with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures and the United States Bankruptcy Code. Even though you are not an attorney; you will still be held to the same rules and standards.

Some people choose to file bankruptcy pro se because they believe they cannot afford an attorney. Speaking with an attorney and discussing your options is your best option. Having an attorney is to your advantage and will likely save you time, money, and offer more protection for your assets. In the instance you have an aggressive creditor violating the collection laws, Heartland Law will prosecute any of your creditors that do not follow the rules once bankruptcy is filed. If you do not have an attorney you will have to handle harassment from creditors, lawsuits and illegal post-bankruptcy garnishments on your own.

There is more to filing for bankruptcy than simply filling out forms. Trying to save money by filing yourself can hurt you in the long run. Often one has to seek counsel to fix a mistake. In the end it will cost you more than if you had simply worked with an attorney in the first place.

Contact one of our experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Heartland Law for a free initial consultation to evaluate your options.







Footnotes

(1) “Filing for Bankruptcy without an Attorney,” This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/Bankruptcy/BankruptcyResources/FilingBankrup tcyWithoutAttorney.aspx

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Digging Deeper Into Debt With Payday Loans

Regularly advertised as an easy source of money, payday loans appeal to people with an urgent need. Bankruptcy and payday loans tend to go hand-in-hand because once you fall behind it can be virtually impossible to catch up.

The payday loan industry claims that these loans are meant to be a small, short term advance used to help a borrower meet their financial needs until their next pay day. The lender holds a check anywhere from a week to a month and in return, the borrower gets cash immediately. These loans unfortunately have extraordinarily high interest rates that more often than not leave a borrower worse off than before. At the time, borrowing this money seems like an appropriate option in an urgent situation, but what the borrower may not realize is that they are only digging themselves deeper into debt.

Lenders say that these loans are used only in emergency situations and over a short term period -- however this is absolutely wrong. A Wall Street analyst conducted a study and found that "the average customer makes 11 transactions a year, which shows that once people take [out a payday loan], they put themselves behind for quite some time(1)." Borrowing from paycheck to paycheck will only result in eventually defaulting on repayment.

In one situation a woman named Andrea Felts took out a loan to help cover expenses after her divorce. She took out a $400 loan and was charged $120 in interest for the 16 day loan period. When she wasn't able to pay the $520 she borrowed, she rolled over the loan for an additional $120 in fees. By the end she rolled her loan over a total of 5 times which resulted in $600 in fees on a $400 payday loan(2).

Once you are already struggling to make ends meet, taking out a payday loan can escalate an already dire situation very quickly and it's all too common for a borrower to eventually file for bankruptcy. For the most part, payday loans are considered unsecured debt and are treated as so during bankruptcy proceedings. Filing for Chapter 7 will allow a debtor to discharge their debt without repayment and essentially all unsecured debt is dischargeable. Under Chapter 13, the payday loan is treated equally along with all other unsecured debt in the debtor’s plan. .

If the loan was received within 60 to 90 days before filing, the loan may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy. The creditor will have the presumption they were taken out with no intention of being paid back. Also, if the electronic authorization or check written to the payday loan company “bounces” or is returned by the bank as insufficient funds, the payday loan company may refer the incident to the County prosecutor for bad check charges. If you are charged with writing a bad check, this is a criminal charge that is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

If you find yourself submerged with debt and your payday loans are only aggravating the situation, contact one of our knowledgeable bankruptcy attorneys for more detailed information.

Footnotes:

(1) M. Anderson, "Cash poor, choice rich, Paycheck-advance firms move in," Sacramento Business Journal (Jan. 11, 1999).
(2) "Payday Lenders: small loans, hefty fees, big problem." Consumer Reports Magazine. 02 2009: n. page. Web. 28 Jun. 2012. <http://www.docstoc.com/docs/23437676/Consumer-Reports-Magazine-February-2009-Payday-lenders-small>.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Custody of Minor Children—What is “Custody”?

"Custody" means joint legal custody, sole legal custody, joint physical custody or sole physical custody or any combination thereof;

"Joint legal custody" means that the parents share the decision-making rights, responsibilities, and authority relating to the health, education and welfare of the child, and, unless allocated, apportioned, or decreed, the parents shall confer with one another in the exercise of decision-making rights, responsibilities, and authority;

"Joint physical custody" means an order awarding each of the parents significant, but not necessarily equal, periods of time during which a child resides with or is under the care and supervision of each of the parents. Joint physical custody shall be shared by the parents in such a way as to assure the child of frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents;

"Third-party custody" means a third party, such as a grandparent or guardian is designated as a legal and physical custodian.

Monday, December 5, 2011

A Kansas City Law Firm with True Heart


Let Heartland Help.

Most people don't think of law as a "helping" profession. But we're not your typical lawyers. We are a Midwestern firm, combining the personal attention of small-town lawyers with the professionalism and expertise of a big-city office. Our Kansas City attorneys go beyond first-rate counsel to provide true service and compassion.

Take a look through our menu of services. If you don't see what you're looking for, get in touch with us to discuss other services we provide. And as always, your first consultation is free.